Quality management strategies such as pay for performance or DM may ultimately prove to be effective in realizing an improved quality of care. Since asthma is a highly prevalent condition with clear clinical guidelines and known levers for achieving effective management, asthma outcomes are a popular choice when incentives are tied to specific clinical outcomes. In the absence of accountability structures that specifically address minority or lower income enrollees, however, the ultimate impact on asthma disparities remains questionable. Despite current evidence regarding the efficacy of DM programs, there is some reason to believe that such programs would help to improve asthma care and thus help to reduce disparities. Many programs have implemented reduced or no cost-sharing policies for asthma drugs. Targeting low-income beneficiaries for such policies could have a substantial impact. Increasing the investment in IT and EHRs should also afford powerful new opportunities to better coordinate and manage patient care. This could greatly improve asthma care and assist in reducing disparities if such efforts are directed toward lower income enrollees and patients with asthma.
Reducing Asthma Disparities Among the Uninsured
Asthma cannot be effectively managed unless individuals have affordable access to a full range of services and receive coordinated, quality Canadian health care. more and more information is present using the service Visit to Canadian Health Care. You will have an opportunity to become acquainted with the bright description about that or this disorder. With the exception of CHCs, uninsured persons with asthma who rely on SNPs for their care typically have little access to routine primary care, leading to excess emergency department utilization and hospitalizations. The increased concentration of uninsured and underinsured patients at SNP sites is likely to decrease the access to and quality of care available to uninsured patients at these sites in the future.